<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>Terra Madre 2006 Blog</title>
    <link>http://blog.terramadre2006.org/index.php/weblog/index/</link>
    <description>Terra Madre 2006 Blog</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>nick@pilchardworks.co.uk</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2008</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2008-03-01T11:21:01+01:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.pmachine.com/" />
    

    <item>
      <title>How is EU hygiene legislation applied in your country?</title>
      <link>http://blog.terramadre2006.org/index.php/kubrick/how_is_eu_hygiene_legislation_applied_in_your_country/</link>
      <description>The EU hygiene legislation should have made the rules more equal between the different EU countries and clearer for all dairy producers. But it seems every country applies the rules to their own interpretation. 


It would be good to have a clear comparison how the different EU countries apply the hygiene legislation for dairy products. How often they audit, what do they audit, what are the costs, what administrative forms have to be filled in, etcetera.</description>
      <dc:subject>Country, Netherlands, Products, Cheese, Language, English</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> The hygiene legislation applying to dairy products in the European Union changed from 1 January 2006. The new requirements lay down that food business operators are responsible for the safety of their products.
</p>
<p>
 The way the Dutch government applies the new rules there is no difference between the dairy industry and small dairy farms. The only dairy farms that don&#8217;t have to register and have no audit costs are the ones that sell - only - directly to customers from their farm shop.
</p>
<p>
 To get approved by HACCP standards every cheese maker – whether industry or farmstead –has to fill out a mass of administrative forms and under go the following minimal audits; once a year an overall audit by COKZ, once every 2 weeks a milk audit, once every 4 weeks a cheese audit. All these audits together have an average yearly cost of €2000.
</p>
<p>
 Farmstead cheese makers know it&#8217;s necessary and even want the audits to be made, but applying the new rules has to be feasible for them. Not only cost wise but also time and work wise. The way the rules are applied now the costs and spent time are in no comparison to their small-scale production.
</p>
<p>
 The article &#8216;Cheese makers controlled to destruction&#8217; in the daily newspaper &#8216;De Volkskrant&#8217; about the struggle of the farmstead cheese makers with the new rules led to questions in Chamber.
</p>
<p>
 No big changes came from the answers of Minister Klink of the health department, but the small dairy farms got some more recognition. Not just for their beautiful crafts products, but also for their traditional contribution to the countryside landscape.
</p>
<p>
 Now a group of Dutch cheese makers has formed and are deliberating the hygiene legislation with the authorities concerned.
</p>
<p>
 It would be good to have a clear comparison how the different EU countries apply the hygiene legislation for dairy products. How often they audit, what do they audit, what are the costs, what administrative forms have to be filled in, etcetera.
</p>
<p>
Please share your experiences&#8230;
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2008-03-01T10:21:01+01:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Razza Maremmana &amp;amp; Slow Food insieme a Tolosa</title>
      <link>http://blog.terramadre2006.org/index.php/kubrick/razza_maremmana_slow_food_insieme_a_tolosa/</link>
      <description>A soli cento chilometri dai Pirenei spagnoli si trova Tolosa, la seconda città universitaria della Francia per numero di studenti residenti dopo Parigi. La “Città Rosa” – è chiamata così per il colore dominante dei suoi antichi edifici &#45; nei primi giorni del mese di dicembre ospita ormai da cinque anni il Salone della Qualità Alimentare (SISQA), una delle più importanti vetrine europee sulle produzioni agricole di eccellenza. In questa occasione, all’interno dell’Atelier del Gusto, Slow Food ha organizzato un primo incontro tra allevatori della razza bovina Maremmana – già Presìdio Slow Food &#45; e di quella Mirandese. Muovendo, infatti, da Tolosa verso l’interno per circa cento chilometri si raggiunge Mirande, un comune di circa 3.600 abitanti situato nel dipartimento del Gers. Questa località ospita da sempre la razza bovina alla quale ha dato il nome; purtroppo solamente il locale Liceo Agricolo e pochi altri allevatori hanno perseguito nel tempo la cura di questi animali, ormai a rischio di estinzione. 

Giovedì 6 dicembre, nella splendida cornice del Salone, in un gradevole auditorium di fronte a circa 90 persone, fra studenti, insegnanti, allevatori e addetti ai lavori, è avvenuta la presentazione delle attività promosse negli anni dal Presìdio Razza Maremmana per la valorizzazione della razza stessa e dei suoi prodotti da parte di Jacopo Goracci, tecnico della Tenuta di Paganico, nonché delle potenzialità di recupero e promozione dei soggetti di Mirandese ad opera del responsabile zootecnico del Liceo Agricolo di Mirande. Inoltre sono stati offerti alcuni piatti tipici prodotti con le due razze, abbinati con ottimo vino italiano – DOC Montecucco “I Bandi” &#45; e francese &#45; Côtes de Gascogne del Lycée Agri&#45;viticole di Riscle: un deciso “peposo”,antica ricetta maremmana a lenta cottura, e una stuzzicante carne battuta al coltello hanno fatto onore alla Toscana, mentre per i padroni di casa è stata presentata una gustosa carne alla griglia.

Per chiudere in bellezza, il giorno successivo è stata organizzata un’interessantissima visita agli allevamenti nel territorio di Mirande dove gli allevatori hanno potuto confrontarsi e, perché no, assaggiare nuovamente i buoni frutti della terra locali.

È stato un onore per la razza Maremmana fare da vera e propria “madrina” della riscoperta di una razza per molto tempo dimenticata che in passato ha caratterizzato pascoli e boschi pirenaici!

Jacopo Goracci

jacopogoracciAThotmailDOTcom</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2008-01-09T15:54:00+01:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Supply of GM&#45;free animal feed to European industries under public and private quality labels</title>
      <link>http://blog.terramadre2006.org/index.php/kubrick/supply_of_gm_free_animal_feed_to_european_industries_under_public_and_priva/</link>
      <description>Business meeting to be held in Brussels, on the 5th and 6th December 2007


The arrival of genetically modified organisms in agriculture has brought about new challenges for quality produce, to meet the needs of European consumers, 80% of whom reject food made using GM technology.

Europe&#8217;s ability to preserve a sustainable supply of GM&#45;free animal feed, and above all soya, is therefore one of the keys to its continuing competitiveness. 

Yet this measure, which meets the needs of consumers and strengthens the credibility of quality European agriculture, will not last in the long term unless Europe and the various zones of soya production that supply it successfully gain a better understanding of each other. 


It is for this purpose that the Committee of the Regions and the GM&#45;Free Regions Network and its 42 member regions take pleasure in inviting you to a conference – business meeting which will be held at the Committee of the Regions, 101 rue Belliard, B–1000 Brussels, on the 5th and 6th December 2007. 

The closing date for registrations is the 15th November 2007. 


The programme for these two days of meetings focuses deliberately on very concrete issues and will enable the invited European agricultural and agro&#45;food players to: 

&#45; Find out about concrete experiences of the implementation of GM&#45;free animal feed industries. 

&#45;Obtain information on the overall situation of the GM&#45;free and organic soya market and have direct contact with producers from the Americas and Asia. 

&#45; Understand the strategy of European distributors regarding GM&#45;free animal feed. 

&#45; Understand the strategy of European distributors regarding GM&#45;free animal feed. 

&#45; Listen to opinions from European Union institutions and professional representatives and take part in discussions on the issue. 


The speakers participating in the event will come from different backgrounds, which will illustrate the wide range of approaches to the issue: 

&#45; European agricultural producers: pork (COOPERL, France, BESH, Germany), poultry (IGP Poulets de Loué, France, Grampian Foods, United Kingdom), cheese (AOP Compté, France), milk (Cooperlat, Italy), animal feed (Gen. No GmbH, Austria). 

&#45; Conventional and organic soya producers: we have brought together two 

producers from the United States (Northland Organic and Stonebridge), from Brazil (IMCOPA and COAMO), from Canada (Manna International and Snobelen Farms), from India (Sonic Biochem Extractions and Ruchi Global), from China (under preparation), an international trading company (Bunge USA) and a national trading company (Solteam France). This session will be introduced by Ken Roseboro, editor in chief of the trade magazine The Organic and Non&#45;GMO Report, published in Iowa (USA). 

&#45; Certification and industrial assistance bodies: INRA (France), Cert&#45;Id (USA), Eurofins Certification (France), Non&#45;GMO Project (USA), ARSIA (Italy), ASSAM (Italy). 

&#45; European distributors: Carrefour (France), British Retail Consortium (United Kingdom), Co&#45;op (United Kingdom), COOP (Italy), Lidl (Germany), Tegut (Germany), COOP (Switzerland). 

&#45; Producer associations and trade unions: COPA&#45;COGECA (Europe), IFOAM 

(international), AREPO (Europe), etc. 

&#45; European decision&#45;makers: Delegations from the European Commission, European Parliament, Committee of the Regions and national ministerial delegations 

&#45; NGOs active in this field: FOE, Greenpeace, GENET, WWF, Italia e Europa senza OGM, etc. 

 

If your industry currently uses GM&#45;free animal feed or wants to incorporate this dimension into its consumer market approach, the Committee of the Regions and the GM&#45;Free Regions Network, with the support of the AREPO, invite you to sign up for the conference – business meeting before the 15th November 2007 on the following website: 

www.gmofree&#45;euregions.net 

or by fax on +33 (0)2 99 27 15 16 


Pascale LOGET 

Vice – President of the Regional Council of Brittany 


In charge of the project:

Mr. Layadi Renaud

renaud.layadi@region&#45;bretagne.fr</description>
      <dc:subject>GMO</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2007-10-23T07:17:00+01:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>No choice: the scenario that the creators of GMO wish to encourage</title>
      <link>http://blog.terramadre2006.org/index.php/kubrick/no_choice_the_scenario_that_the_creators_of_gmo_wish_to_encourage/</link>
      <description>Dear friends,


I was very pleased to read Carlo Petrini&#8217;s statements on the invasive GMO 

and biofuel threat, on the Terra Madre Newsletter.


Attempts to force GMOs on citizens and on the agriculture that feeds us all, 

is surely one of the most pernitious crimes against humanity ever to have 

been perpetrated on the living world. We would only need to rely on 

laboratory created, patented &#8220;novel food&#8221; if no other choice existed. And it 

is precisely this scenario that the creators of GMO wish to encourage.


One should be in no doubt about this. The ultimate (corporate) objective for 

the &#8220;tomorrow&#8221; which Carlo Petrini refers to, is for corporations to rest 

control of the entire food chain. Already GM seed processors Cargill and 

Monsanto between them, own aproximately 60% of commercial seed stocks and 

are increasingly exercising control over the farmers that buy from them.


In the USA, most of the small print in the contracts that would&#45;be GM 

farmers unwittingly sign carries a phrase stating that the signee has no 

right to go to law to defend him/herself in the case of any problems. This 

constitutes an extraordinary invasion of democratic rights and it is not 

just aimed at US farmers.. The present US adminstration is supporting a 

process of world food supply hegemony and is putting increasing pressure on 

National governments to comply with it&#8217;s dictats.


In face of this unprecidented attempt to pollute and cross contaminate our 

native and indigenous food supplies with highly unstable gene altered plants 

and animals &#45; there can be only one solution: an outright GMO ban.


If one wishes to stop an invasion of one&#8217;s Country one has to close the door 

and then fight for one&#8217;s survival.

All members and supporters of the Slow Food movement must now rally to this 

call. The damage which will be done if we cannot repel this invader is 

almost beyond our comprehension. There is no time left to take any other 

step than to DEMAND a cessation of all GM plantings in Europe and beyond.


There is no more aware and powerful an organisation than Slow Food to lead 

such a call: firstly to our governments and the European Commission.


The current scientific evidence is conclusive in exposing the manifest 

dangers inherent in GMO foods and in the complete impossibility of 

controlling field based seed and pollen cross&#45;contamination via the absurd 

instigation of &#8220;Coexistence&#8221; measures proposed by the European Commission.


A new GMO Moratorium (leading to an outright ban) must be called for by all 

citizens who care about the future of their food and environment. The 

&#8216;precautionary principle&#8217; upon which EU law was founded, has failed us. We 

have no other option than to demand the immediate cessation of all GMO 

imports. A great surge of support for this action from Slow Food enthusiasts 

will be the best possible way to launch this uniquely important campaign!


If enough people reply positively to this letter we can form a spearhead 

steering group to hammer out our demands for a GMO Free World and join 

forces with other activists struggling for the same aims.


NOW is the time.


In anticipation,


Julian Rose


(organic farmer,author of Slow&#8217;s Manifesto for Raw Milk Cheese and President 

of the International Coalition to Protect the Polish Countryside)</description>
      <dc:subject>GMO</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2007-09-03T07:59:00+01:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>GMO ban in Poland at risk</title>
      <link>http://blog.terramadre2006.org/index.php/kubrick/gmo_ban_in_poland_at_risk/</link>
      <description>Dear Friends,


The current GMO ban, introduced by the present government in 2006, still

holds to&#45;day. However, it is in serious danger of being undermined by the

imminent introduction of a new law that would allow the commercial planting

of GMO. The European Commission rejected the blanket Polish ban on GMO

imports as being illegal under EU freedom of trade regulations. The Polish

government

has responded by coming up with a new Act that will almost certainly be a

&#8216;compromise

solution&#8217;. The new Act will soon be discussed by the upper and lower

houses of the Polish parliament and a decision reached.


In our view the situation smells strongly of betrayal. Rather than stand up

and fight for what is a perfectly valid outlawing of an extremely dangerous

genetic experiment, the government is preparing to capitulate to the typical

bargaining games of political ineptitude and corruption. We will fight to

keep the current ban in place and we sincerely hope that all other aware

activists will recognise the importance of maintaining the Polish GMO ban.

It has enormous significance for the whole of Europe and beyond, not just

symbolically, but because Polish farmers maintain a highly diverse &#45; and

informal &#45; indigenous seed base which would be quickly wiped out if GMO were

allowed to proliferate the countryside.

This seed base can be shared with other countries of similar

geographic topography and will surely be very much needed in the not so

distant future.


Currently there are a number of GM field trials taking place at different

research stations around the Country.

They are mostly small scale (0.5 ha) plots but there are possibly some

larger maize trials.

As with virtually all other Countries, GM reseach and development is carried

out into a wide

range of fruits, vegetables and cereals, revealing the degree of

contamination which could be unleashed if such

genetically modified foods were to become legalized.


ICPPC calls upon all members of the Network for GMO Free World and all our

friends in other Countries to now send a short letter of alarm to the

leaders of the upper and lower houses of the Polish Parliament (where the

new act will

be debated: date unknown), calling for the secure maintenance of the present

GMO import ban and resistance to the irresponsible demands of Brussels. See

addresses below.

PLEASE send a copy to us!


Every Country must now help every other Country to reach our unified goal of

a GMO Free World.


Thank you dear friends!


Warm wishes,


Julian and Jadwiga

============

ICPPC &#45; International Coalition to Protect the Polish Countryside,

Międzynarodowa Koalicja dla Ochrony Polskiej Wsi

34&#45;146 Stryszów 156, Poland tel./fax +48 33 8797114

biuro@icppc.pl http://www.icppc.pl  http://www.gmo.icppc.pl http://www.eko&#45;cel.pl


******************

Chairman of Upper House

Bogdan Borusewicz

biuro@b&#45;borusewicz.pl  or borusewicz@nw.senat.gov.pl

Biuro Senatorskie Bogdana Borusewicza

Marszałka Senatu RP

ul. Ogarna 99/100

80&#45;826 Gdańsk

tel.: +48 58 320 84 83

fax: +48 58 320 84 84


Chairman of Lower House

Ludwik Dorn

Ludwik.Dorn@sejm.pl

Biuro Poselskie Posła Ludwika Dorna

ul. Koszykowa 10

00&#45;564 Warszawa

woj. mazowieckie

tel. +48 (22) 621&#45;29&#45;24, (22) 621&#45;37&#45;18

fax  +48 (22) 621&#45;38&#45;12

*************************</description>
      <dc:subject>GMO</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2007-08-07T07:54:00+01:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Farm Legislation is About You!</title>
      <link>http://blog.terramadre2006.org/index.php/kubrick/farm_legislation_is_about_you/</link>
      <description>FARM LEGISLATION IS ABOUT YOU!


Why aren&#8217;t we talking about the Farm Bill?&amp;nbsp; Why do we seem to think it&#8217;s about someone else?&amp;nbsp; Farm legislation is being written and voted on right now.&amp;nbsp; We are ignoring an opportunity that comes only once every 6 years; an opportunity to influence how our tax dollars are spent on the most basic, crucial, and insecure segment of our economy, and our lives.


I&#8217;m talking about food.&amp;nbsp; We all eat.&amp;nbsp; Every single American, every single day, requires food to survive.&amp;nbsp; Farms produce our food.&amp;nbsp; Currently, our tax dollars support the production of high fructose corn syrup, and ignore the production of clean, healthy, locally produced food.&amp;nbsp; Current farm subsidies do not help small, local farmers who produce fresh, healthy food for our communities throughout the country.&amp;nbsp; Let&#8217;s tell our legislators that we want our farm dollars spent on small farms all over America; farms that produce food near where Americans live and eat.


Food is not a luxury.&amp;nbsp; It is not even an important convenience on the level of gasoline for cars or electricity for air conditioning.&amp;nbsp; Each person in America must have food every day.&amp;nbsp; Shouldn&#8217;t food be produced in as many locations, and near as many people, as many eaters, as possible?&amp;nbsp; Doesn&#8217;t it seem normal that we should have food growing near us, near our kitchens and our tables?&amp;nbsp; Shouldn&#8217;t food security be a basic, everyday, top priority for all of us?&amp;nbsp; Food security means securing our food production within our borders, and within reach of the people who need food.&amp;nbsp; That is every American!&amp;nbsp; It is the responsibility of our government to produce farm legislation focused on support of  local food production.&amp;nbsp; That means supporting smaller farms producing a variety of food products in all regions of the country.


Why is more and more of our food produced farther and farther away from our people?&amp;nbsp; We are extremely lucky, here in the Skagit region, to still have food growing conveniently near us.&amp;nbsp; We can still get fresh, varied, tasty, healthy food, produced by our neighbors.&amp;nbsp; It has required the work of many individuals and organizations to keep what we have, to this point.&amp;nbsp; Most small farming regions in the country have not been so lucky, especially those near large population centers.&amp;nbsp; Current legislation supports the big and centralized, and ignores the small and regional.&amp;nbsp; Current legislation supports large scale commodity production, not small scale local food production.&amp;nbsp; Farming on a small local scale cannot compete, by price, with huge, subsidized, agribusiness operations, especially those in less developed countries. 


How have we become convinced that price is the only consideration in selecting the food we eat?&amp;nbsp; Can&#8217;t we see the huge added costs in food produced with chemicals, processed and shipped across the country or the world?&amp;nbsp; Can&#8217;t we see the costs to our air, our health, our climate, our water?&amp;nbsp; Can&#8217;t we see the cost in depleted nutrition, and loss of flavor, of foods grown purely for shipping?&amp;nbsp; What are we doing to our soil, our water, our children and our future?


When food is grown near our community it doesn&#8217;t have to be trucked or shipped across great distances, burning fuel and polluting the air.&amp;nbsp; It is not vulnerable to disruptions in transportation, from any source.&amp;nbsp; When food is grown near our community we can be aware of the farming methods used, and the results of those methods on our food, and our environment.&amp;nbsp; We can get to know the people who grow our food.&amp;nbsp; The money we spend on our food can go to our neighbors, for them spend in our community.&amp;nbsp; Some think it&#8217;s more efficient to grow masses of one food item in one giant agribusiness location somewhere with cheap land and cheap labor.&amp;nbsp; I think it&#8217;s more efficient for every community to have food nearby, near the market, near the kitchen, near the table.


When I was young, good nutrition meant getting enough to eat. That&#8217;s it.&amp;nbsp; We now know that what we eat is as important as how much.&amp;nbsp; We know that it does matter whether we survive on sweet, fatty, processed junk, or thrive on healthy, fresh, clean food.&amp;nbsp; Our farm legislation has been stuck in the past, supporting commodity production instead of fresh food.&amp;nbsp; One of the reasons it is stuck in the past is because we have allowed it.&amp;nbsp; 


When I mention the Farm Bill here, even to farmers, they seem to think that this legislation is not about them, not about us.&amp;nbsp; But, it is about us.&amp;nbsp; It must be about us.&amp;nbsp; This is our money and it is our food.&amp;nbsp; What food do we want our tax money to support?


This year there is potential for movement toward better, more responsible and appropriate farm legislation.&amp;nbsp; This year we have a chance to convince our representatives that we want our money spent on our food.&amp;nbsp; We want our money spent all over the country, in small farming communities struggling to keep land in food production.&amp;nbsp; We want our money spent to increase local food production throughout this country.&amp;nbsp; 


The Farm Bill legislation is being written right now.&amp;nbsp; It will be voted on during the next couple of weeks.&amp;nbsp; We must let our representatives know what we want so they can represent us.&amp;nbsp; We must tell our legislators how we want our money spent.&amp;nbsp; We must let our government know that we do not accept the farm legislation of the past.&amp;nbsp; We expect our representatives to move into the future with farm legislation that actually helps everyone in the country, by supporting local food production in every state, every region, every community.


Carol Havens &#45; Convivium Leader

Slow Food Skagit River Salish Sea 

Washington (State) USA 

chavens AT cnw DOT com</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2007-06-21T17:37:01+01:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>De Tlaxcala  México</title>
      <link>http://blog.terramadre2006.org/index.php/kubrick/de_tlaxcala_mexico/</link>
      <description>Saludamos a toda la comunidad Terra Madre desde la pequeña región donde se crearon las TORTILLAS  alimento de millones de personas.

Agradecemos también la magnifica oportunidad de haber estado en Turín con todos aquellos con los que convergemos en producir un alimento bueno, limpio y justo, precisamente , cuando estabamos tan desmoralizados , porque en México se vuelve cada día más díficil y poco se aprecia el esfuerzo para lograrlo; Gracias también, por habernos imbuido de nuevos ánimos al permitirnos ver que esto, que aislados tratamos de hacer en nuestra región,  es ya un movimiento mundial. Seguiremos trabajando para ofrecer nuestras TORTILLAS DE MA?Z NATIVO Y NOPAL,  donde se conjuga el saber milenario de los agricultores, la tradición culinaria y la herbolaria mexicanos.

Ofrecemos nuestra colaboración para cualquier tarea que sea útil al movimiento Terra Madre y Slow Food.

Salud a todos 

Con cariño 

María Trinidad Langarica                       Gustavo Rosete Olvera

mtrinilang@yahoo.com.mx                     gusarturrosete@yahoo.com.mx

Tels. 52 55 56 31 52 66                         52 241 10 90 249

Yucalpeten Mzna 65 Lote 6                     Venustiano Carranza S/N San Antonio 

Col. Mirador 2, Tlapan                            Huexotitla, Tlaxco Tlaxcala, C.P. 90250

México D.F.&amp;nbsp;                                          México. Apdo. Postal Nº 2

C.P. 14748 México D.F.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2007-04-08T19:34:00+01:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>The breakdown of organic Sorghum</title>
      <link>http://blog.terramadre2006.org/index.php/kubrick/the_breakdown_of_organic_sorghum/</link>
      <description>Organic agriculture promote energetic saving, trough the right choice of alternative ways respect to common practices used in conventional cultivation processes. Corn represent one of the main animal nutrition feedstuff even if its culture is strongly linked with a high use of water for irrigation, especially in region characterized by a low rain period during spring and summer. So, other solutions are required in the name of environment and money saving. Africans used Sorghum since hundred of years thanks to its resistance to dry climate conditions.


We can evaluate that corn needs 4500 m3/ha of water; on the contrary Sorghum requires almost 2200m3/ha. Therefore, we have to spry almost 550 litres of water in order to produce 1 kg of corn seeds, while only 350 litres for 1 kg of Sorghum grains for an harvest of almost 6 and 8 tons/ha respectively. 


That reveal the central importance of Sorghum in crop rotations linked with animal husbandry.


Unfortunately in Italy we have a paradox: no one sell organic Sorghum seeds since too many years even if south regions have a strong summer water deficiency. In addition there is a lack of any encouraging promotional programs to move farms into organic Sorghum seeds production. Besides nearly the whole commercialised Sorghum has been treated with pesticides, such as Tetrasol® (Thiram), making it unusable in organic agriculture.


In conclusion, I’m wondering why it happens and which is the best solution to adopt! In the next years I will try to make Sorghum seeds by my self, facing all the expected technical difficulties &#45; such as mildew, seed germinability, and so on… &#45; that are common and frequent in a small farms, but irrelevant for an organized corporation&#8230;


Waiting some interesting suggestions,

Best wishes.

Jacopo Goracci 


jgoracciATvetDOTunipiDOTit 

jacopogoracciAThotmailDOTcom</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2007-03-14T07:40:00+01:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Sorgo: biologico impossibile</title>
      <link>http://blog.terramadre2006.org/index.php/kubrick/sorgo_biologico_impossibile/</link>
      <description>L’agricoltura biologica promuove da sempre il risparmio energetico soprattutto attraverso la scelta di canali alternativi rispetto a quelli comunemente percorsi nel circuito “convenzionale?. La coltivazione del mais, importante alimento per l’alimentazione animale, risulta però strettamente legata al grande consumo di acqua per l’irrigazione, soprattutto nelle regioni centro&#45;meridionali dell’Italia caratterizzate da una scarsa piovosità nel periodo primaverile&#45;estivo. Da qui sorge l’esigenza di trovare altre soluzioni più rispettose dell’ambiente e delle “tasche? dei contadini. In Africa, per esempio, la coltivazione del sorgo (di cui ho avuto la fortuna di acquistarne un po’ da un’amica agricoltrice del Mali nell’Agorà di Terra Madre!) viene praticata fin dall’antichità, grazie alla sua grande resistenza ai climi aridi.


Facendo due conti possiamo notare che con un volume di adacquamento pari a circa 2200 m3/ha per il sorgo e 4500 m3/ha per il mais, otteniamo circa 350 litri di acqua utilizzati per produrre 1 kg di sorgo contro più di 550 litri per ottenerne uno di mais (calcolando una resa media rispettivamente di 60 e 80 q.li/ha). Da ciò si può capire il grande risparmio energetico ed economico nella scelta del sorgo come coltura miglioratrice da rinnovo nelle rotazioni agronomiche.


Ecco il paradosso: in Italia non esiste (o quasi) sorgo coltivato con metodo biologico. Inoltre, quello convenzionale viene sistematicamente trattato per esempio con Tetrasol® (Thiram) rendendolo INUTILIZZABILE in agricoltura biologica. E se questo venisse seminato, verrebbe rimesso in conversione il campo stesso, a causa dei residui lasciati dagli anticrittogamici. Tutto ciò avviene nell’indifferenza generale.


Mi chiedo, quindi, come ciò possa accadere senza che nessuno faccia niente per cercare strade alternative (anche se mi rendo conto della difficoltà di mantenere vitale il seme di sorgo senza imbattersi in “fenomeni degenerativi? come le muffe) e incentivare una produzione biologica perfettamente in linea con il risparmio energetico, il ridotto impiego di fonti non rinnovabili (i.e. acqua) e l’agricoltura eco&#45;compatibile!


Salutandovi, vi chiedo se possibile consigli e/o suggerimenti in merito.


Jacopo Goracci


jgoracciATvetDOTunipiDOTit

jacopogoracciAThotmailDOTcom</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2007-02-19T15:58:00+01:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>An Incredible Gift</title>
      <link>http://blog.terramadre2006.org/index.php/kubrick/an_incredible_gift/</link>
      <description>My husband Alex and I were two of the extremely fortunate participants in both Terra Madre events.&amp;nbsp; There really hasn’t been a separation in the two events for us happily it has been a continuation.&amp;nbsp; So, I have to start talking about Terra Madre 2004 in order to tell our story of Terra Madre 2006. 


Terra Madre 2004.&amp;nbsp; 

We spent our first day in Torino at the Palazzo di Lavoro watching as people from around the world poured through the doors.&amp;nbsp; They came by the bus load: groups from Mongolia and Brazil, the Congo and Sweden.&amp;nbsp; As the day wore on we became increasingly aware that this was going to be an experience like no other.&amp;nbsp; We were in a room, a giant room, with farmers literally from every corner of the world.&amp;nbsp; Just being in that room, was an incredibly powerful experience for me.&amp;nbsp; We were all just “there? in a proverbial sea of humanity.&amp;nbsp;  As confusing and chaotic as it seemed at times that day I think it was the perfect way to begin. We were all reminded just how much communication can take place simply by looking another person in the eye and wanting to understand.&amp;nbsp; At one moment I stood face to face with a farmer from Afghanistan. We looked each other in the eye, we understood each other, we touched hands. I will remember the moment forever.</description>
      <dc:subject>Food Community, Country, USA, Language, English</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a day in that incredible swirl of humanity we were loaded onto a bus and delivered to our host families.&nbsp; Waiting that first night in the dark were Katy and Michele Piovano, their then 14 year-old son, Lorenzo and Michele’s uncle, Oscar Novara.&nbsp; At this point in time, neither Alex nor I spoke or understood a word of Italian. Katy and Michele don’t speak English. The elegant, gentle Oscar speaks some English but not often.&nbsp; It wasn’t an effortless dialog but it was wonderful.
</p>
<p>
Michele and Katy are producers of the renowned Piemontese vitelli.&nbsp;  The production of Piemontese vitelli the way Michele and Katy do it is an absolute art.&nbsp; They control they entire process; from sowing the seed for the grains the animals eat in the field to hanging the salamis…Michele and Katy maintain exact records of every animal from embryo transfer through sale in their macelleria.&nbsp; You can taste the constant attention to detail and 
<br />
refinement in every bite.&nbsp; They take pride in every aspect of their work and the artistry is clearly visible, the meat is incredible.&nbsp; 
</p>
<p>
I think that you can taste the richness of their history and that place in the meat.&nbsp; 
<br />
 For generations the entire family has gathered here at this farm to share the work, tell the stories, laugh, cry and of course… eat.&nbsp; 
</p>
<p>
Their farm and macelleria is just outside of Torino, the town consists mostly of farms and other buildings that were built to support the Palazzina di Caccia di Stupinigi. The Palazzina and its surrounding fields and forests are owned by the Regione Piemonte and are protected and maintained in the Parco naturale di Stupinigi.&nbsp; They are recognized by UNESCO as a world heritage site because of their outstanding cultural and natural importance. 
<br />
 
<br />
However, the farm buildings, shops, and restaurants of Stupinigi are owned by the Ordine Mauriziano and do not have the same protection.&nbsp; The Ordine is does not have the financial resources to maintain the buildings and is going to sell its interests in Stupinigi. The fates of the Piovano family and their neighbors have yet to be decided.&nbsp; The idea that this unique and intact resource could be divided seems a terrible waste to me. 
</p>
<p>
Terra Madre 2006
<br />
When we got word that Terra Madre 2006 was going to include a delegation of chefs we were ecstatic.&nbsp; Alex and I have had the privilege of working with and learning from Ben and Karen Barker for more than 20 years.&nbsp; Both Ben and Karen have deep culinary roots.&nbsp; Ben is a native North Carolinian, whose family still lives in the area.&nbsp;   Karen a New Yorker by birth has naturalized well without loosing any of the familial culinary wealth, which is vast.&nbsp;  Ben and Karen are the chef –owners of Magnolia Grill in Durham, North Carolina.&nbsp; They are both the kind of chefs that make you want to produce a better vegetable, even after 25 years of farming.
</p>
<p>
We didn’t know how it would all work out but I knew that we needed to experience this with our longtime friends, colleagues and customers.&nbsp; Alex and I wanted to travel in Italy and see, touch and certainly taste the food with the Barkers.&nbsp; We wanted to explore the basic elements of food, to talk about ingredients and where they lead a chef.&nbsp;  We want to collaborate better.&nbsp; 
</p>
<p>
At Terra Madre 2006 all the stars aligned and there we were with the Piovanos and the Barkers in the same room.&nbsp;  The opportunity was not wasted.&nbsp; It is great fun to watch two sets of great artists work together.&nbsp;  Together we spent the entire day in the Macelleria Piovano.&nbsp; With the assistance of his beautifully bilingual cousin Diego Novara, Michele showed us the farm, the macelleria, he talked about how the animals are raised, hanging the meat, how it was cut, and how he made salami, everything with the typical family generosity.
</p>
<p>
Michele’s mother, Mariuccia patiently explained (via Diego) as she prepared her special green sauce.&nbsp; Mirella, who works in the shop, demonstrated her specialties.&nbsp; The quick morning tour lasted past 4:00 in the afternoon.&nbsp; We probably spent as much time talking about the cultural and regional elements of the food as much as the food itself.&nbsp; 
<br />
As we learned we ate…everything, and certainly more than our share of their incredible carne cruda.&nbsp; Carne cruda which can only be made with that beautiful meat.&nbsp; Oh, and yes we did punctuate the day with a lunch that took Katy, Mirella, Mariuccia, and Ben quite some time to prepare. 
</p>
<p>
Our situation is completely different from Katy and Michele’s.&nbsp;  For us, there was no family farm. We don’t have that beautiful long, strong tie to “place?.&nbsp; Our families had been “off the farm? for generations. Like many “first generation farmers? we concentrated on the business of farming, we had to in order to survive. We had always thought about what we do in terms of “organic?, “specialty foods? and “niche marketing?.&nbsp; Hardly a thought about the history, heritage or of the regional culture that surrounds us.&nbsp; 
</p>
<p>
I had been raised in a family where my immigrant grandparents had worked from the first day they put their feet on North American soil until the day each one of them died,  to loose all traces of their country of origin. They were quite successful; after a few years no one would ever have known where they were born without looking at their documents. Now, it seems crazy to try and erase your culture but that was the popular thinking then.
</p>
<p>
At Terra Madre the strength and beauty of the world’s cultural differences was very apparent.&nbsp; I came back from Terra Madre changed. After Terra Madre, and my international tutoring session, I realized that if you don’t know or don’t remember the traditions and culture you only get half the flavor. The experience taught me to think about what I do and what I produce in a different way. I am lucky enough to live in a place where there is still a strong regional identity.&nbsp; I have neighbors and friends whose families have lived here for generations.&nbsp; Their roots are deep and they are happy to share. It is not the culture I was born into, but it is one I can learn, preserve and enjoy.&nbsp; 
</p>
<p>
We are delighted that Terra Madre will continue.&nbsp; It is an incredible gift.&nbsp; Thank you all for all the work and most importantly…thank you for having the vision.&nbsp; In a world of more than 6,573,651,157 people we are each only one, but somehow you all got up in morning and said “let’s do this?.&nbsp; It is incredible to me that you all took on such a huge project.&nbsp; . 
<br />
It is very difficult for me to find the right words…everything sounds so trite. Through peace, respect and gentleness Terra Madre provides us all with an opportunity to work together to make this world better.&nbsp; That is no small accomplishment.&nbsp; Thank you.
</p>

<p>
Food community:&nbsp; Sustainable Meat Producers of Central North Carolina
</p>
<p>
Alex and Betsy Hitt
<br />
Peregrine Farm
<br />
9418 Perry Road
<br />
Graham, North Carolina 
<br />
U.S.A. 27253
<br />

</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2007-02-17T14:04:00+01:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>